|
by Donald W. Jackson
Donald Jackson investigates the United Kingdom's surprisingly
dismal record of violations of the European Convention on Human
Rights. During the first thirty years of the European Court of
Human Rights (1959-89), the UK was found in violation of the
Convention more frequently than any other country, and its
violations have continued apace in the 1990s. Jackson traces the
source of the problem through the UK's lack of judicially
enforceable rights law to the application of
executive/bureaucratic discretion under UK law.
7 tables, notes, bibliography, index.
ISBN 0-8130-1487-5
|
"In this well-documented, clearly written study, Jackson . . . shows how
human rights principles, as contained in the European Convention, have brought 'some measure of accountability to those who exercise power and discretion in the United Kingdom' . . . The result is about as good a study as can be imagined, making a clear argument that a written charter of rights - exemplified by the European Convention - would be appropriate for incorporation into British domestic law. . . . Many international law and human rights specialists will find this important work valuable."--Choice "Provocative not only in its own right but in terms of advancing discussion of the U.S. and international action on human rights. The author has read a large amount of material about the European Convention on Human Rights, from both primary and secondary sources. To this he has added material on U.S. and British constitutional law. The result is a stimulating and wide-ranging discussion."--David Forsythe, University of Nebraska |